My trip to Bucharest (Bucureşti) wasn't at all planned; it was a holiday day in Germany, so two days before I decided to do a 'Blind Booking' with GermanWings. Basically you pay €40 and after you have paid you find out where you are going; I got Bucharest. If I'm honest it's not a city that I have ever had the urge to visit, but was so glad that I went.
I stepped off the plane into 25°C heat (compared to closer to 5°C) in Bonn, and after wading through the endless taxi scammers, caught a bus into the city - well I hoped it was going into the city anyway; I just followed a woman with a suitcase. Someone about Bucharest immediately drew me in. I'm a real city boy, and this is a real eastern European metropolis. It's busy and full of cars, pollution, dirt, dust, amplified Eastern Orthodox plainchant coming out of dark and incense-filled churches, fast paced people, green lungs of grass and trees in the middle of eight-lane roundabouts, street vendors hawking miscellaneous meat and is humid as hell. Sounds like a nightmare, but the sadist in me likes it. Oh, and there are lots of fountains - and I'm a sucker for a good fountain, me.
My first port of call, was the Palace of the Parliament (Palatul Parlamentului). It is the second largest building in the world, after the Pentagon in the US, and was built (but not completed) under the Ceauşescu's regime. Indeed, it is still not fully completed and many of the 1000 plus rooms are still unused. The tour of the building isn't the most interesting hour I've spent in my life, but it is the only way to get in - unless you are a member of the Romanian Parliament, and the guide did throw around some interesting facts - he was especially keen to point out the natural air conditioning system in each room that was installed because of Ceauşescu's paranoia of being poisoned. He also furthered the myth of Michael Jackson being the first person to actually speak from the Presidential Balcony, making the ultimate faux-pas of shouting, 'HELLO BUDAPEST' during his Bucharest concert - supposedly it did happen, just somewhere else.
Substantial and historical parts of Bucharest was bulldozed for the building and the grand avenues of Communist concrete that surround it, and all the materials used in the construction and decoration came from different parts of Romania - as such, it was going to be named 'The People's Palace', and that name still holds firm for some Romanians. There are many impressive rooms and halls, and more chandeliers than you could shake a stick at, but what struck me most was the exterior and the palace grounds. Whilst everything inside is of the highest quality and clearly well looked after; outside there are piles of rusting pipes, potholes that are fighting to gain quarry status, crumbling cobbles and a formal garden that has been long been gifted back to Nature. Whilst it is clear that Romania is still grappling with poverty, it would appear strange that such an icon of the capital city would be, outwardly, left to languish. Perhaps it is the conflict of the palace being the seat of democratic power in present day Romania, and what it was intended to be; a fortress of potency and fear (it looks down on the city from its highest point) for the Communist leaders. Or something. What is clear however, is that it is indeed a very big building. It takes around 25 minutes to walk from the tour entrance to the entrance of the new Museum of Contemporary Art, which is on the other side.
The Museum of Contemporary Art (or MNAC), is housed in a glass extension to the main palace and appeared to be free to go in - in that no one asked me for any money, or in fact acknowledged that I had entered the at all. This part of the palace is a real contrast to the main building; all varnished pine and white walls. It surprised me by having quite a good selection of exhibitions. Each of the four floors is dedicated to one exhibition or artist, and the video installations from Regina José Galindo of Guatemala really stayed with me. She won the Golden Lion at the Venice Biennale in 2005, and is known for incorporating her own body, and its limits, into her performance art. One of the videos, probably the least graphic of the collection, held me for a good 20 minutes. Entitled ¿Quién Puede Borrar las Huellas? (Who Can Erase the Traces), the video follows Galindo as she walks barefoot from the Congress of Guatemala to the National Palace carrying a white plastic tub full of human blood. Every four or five steps she puts the tub down and places her feet in it, leaving, therefore a trace of footsteps as a protest against the presidency of José Enfraín Ríos Montt, and the atrocities that he oversaw. She walks through a series of busy narrow street, full of shoppers and market stalls, and actually what struck me was how few people even noticed that there was a woman leaving footprints of blood on the street, simply pushing past, in their own worlds. To ease you out of blood, water-boarding and self-flagellation, there is a roof-top café that sells disgusting coffee, but lots of weird and wonderful teas, and whilst the view over Bucharest doesn't exactly compare with Manhattan or Paris, it's a nice place to take in the city and hang out with Bucharest's art glitterati.
I did many other things over the next few days; went to a concert at the beautiful Romanian Athenaeum; walked - a lot, ate fresh, warm, chocolate-filled pastries - a lot; left the city to visit Peles Castle in Sinai and Braşov (I'll write about them in another post, sometime. Maybe); ate ice cream in the vast parks (including one where the hedges are shaped into dolphins. Yes, dolphins. Jumping through hedge-shaped hoops); bathed in the sunlight in the cloister courtyard of Mănăstirea Stavropoleos; maintained an interested look as an old lady shouted at me in Romanian about the merits of George Enescu (I was impressed that I managed to grasp even the topic of our conversation); marvelled at how 100 electricity wires can come together on a pole and still manage to work; sat through two of the biggest thunder and lightening storms I've ever experienced; dodged packs of stray dogs, or 'community dogs' as they are now termed; and visited the Arc de Triomphe, just at the end of Bucharest's version of the Champs Elysée on Charles de Gaulle Square (sound familiar?).
The one thing that nearly all of the guidebooks say you must visit in Bucharest is the Romanian Peasant Museum. The name kind of jars in my brain and sounding both utterly dull and slightly un-pc, but it is a gem of a museum. It's on the edge of a large park and some of the exhibits were so stirring so as to nearly bring a tear to the eyes of this cynical Ice King. One exhibit, the belongings of an anonymous Romanian lady; religious idols, lace shawls, tupperware, photographs and a moth eaten chair amongst other things, all arranged to look like her compact flat, is something that I would normally probably glance at on my way to something 'important', but the handmade card at the side kept me there for much longer than any Picasso or Monet has:
'Few people are ignorant of what happiness in grandma's kitchen means. The problem is what you do after grandma is dead. You come into an inheritance that sometimes becomes a burden. You cannot keep all the objects, words, gestures, smells... At least put some of the memories in a safe place.'
Another piece of advice from the Fire exhibition was that 'If the boiling milk boils over, stew some salt on it or else the cow's tits will burst'. Something to remember next time you stick a bowl of porridge in the microwave - just think of those Cravendale cows hundreds of miles away.
Before I made by way back to the airport I popped into the Zambaccian Museum, which, I guess, is Bucharest's answer to the Frick Collection in New York. The art was collected and lovingly arranged by businessman Krikor Zambaccian and is displayed in his house exactly in the way he wished. It's a lovely collection (including Romania's only Cezanne); is, as with all the museums and galleries in Bucharest, extremely cheap; and I was the only visitor there. My only (huge) bugbear was that the gallery's ladies-in-attendance were perhaps a little (annoyingly to the point of milk-boiling-tit-bursting) omnipresent. There seemed to be (at least) one per artwork and I started playing a game of getting myself just out of their eye-line to see how long before I saw a stony face creep back from somewhere. It became so off-putting that I didn't stay very long and went for ice cream instead - any excuse for ice cream to be honest.
And that ended my trip to Bucharest. I would definitely recommend it as a city break destination. It has all the draw of a big city, but still holds some of the allure of the unknown and undiscovered. The city seems to be making big strides to improving both its appearance and tourist infrastructure, so it's a good time to visit; everything is still cheap, and there are as yet no coach tours. And whilst the 'community dogs' may have rabies, they add some character to the streets - just watch your step when walking along non-lit streets at night, I'm sure they're probably not so placid once their tails have been stepped on.